|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 24 post(s) |

AkJon Ferguson
JC Ferguson and Son Ltd
|
Posted - 2010.11.25 19:02:00 -
[1]
First they came for the learning skills. And I didn't speak up because I'd been too lazy to max mine.
Then they came with the microtransactions. And I didn't speak up because I like hats. (Especially asshats.)
Then they let bots and bugs proliferate all over the server. And I didn't speak up because my friends all use ratting bots and gameplay is overrated.
Then they came for the sandbox. And by that time no one was left to speak up.
|

AkJon Ferguson
JC Ferguson and Son Ltd
|
Posted - 2010.11.25 19:36:00 -
[2]
K so with minimum 17/17 then remap to 27/21 then +5 implant to 32/26.
WTF CCP, you're making me train SLOWER???
|

AkJon Ferguson
JC Ferguson and Son Ltd
|
Posted - 2010.11.25 19:45:00 -
[3]
Continuing my line of thought.
This is a really stupid idea, CCP. Here's a better one:
Get rid of tier 1 learning skills EXCEPT LEARNING.
Give everyone the 5 points from the tier 1's. Reduce tier 2 learning skills to a x1 or x2 train. Reimburse the difference to those who've already trained them. Reduce the noob bonus from 100% to 50%.
Fire the idiot who came up with the existing plan, since it took me about 5 minutes to come up with a better one, for free.
That way everyone is happy.
|

AkJon Ferguson
JC Ferguson and Son Ltd
|
Posted - 2010.11.25 21:33:00 -
[4]
CCP's Newest Hire
I think this guy will fit in well with the current crowd at CCP responsible for this decision.
|

AkJon Ferguson
JC Ferguson and Son Ltd
|
Posted - 2010.11.25 21:43:00 -
[5]
What we need is a player's union. 
While this decision is lame, framing it as a 'gift' is lame, and the simple alternative of removing (and reimbursing) all tier 2 learning skills (in conjunction with nerfing the noob training bonus) is infinitely superior, it's slightly less horrific than many of CCP's recent decisions.
While having my training speed reduced sucks, I feel particularly badly for the new folks who have done the 5/4 training grind and now are just out the ISK and the time. (And no, CCP's dishonest attempt to mollify them doesn't add up.)
|

AkJon Ferguson
JC Ferguson and Son Ltd
|
Posted - 2010.11.25 21:59:00 -
[6]
Originally by: Cyberus ""You have entered a universe where the path to glory is paved by one's choices. Those choices do not come without consequence, and every action taken can carry one closer to their highest goals or drag them down to unimaginable depths.""
-=Author: CCP=-
"Eve online: Incursion Clone wars."
Hope next time we all get same portret so we all look the same and reduce server load :).
+1
|

AkJon Ferguson
JC Ferguson and Son Ltd
|
Posted - 2010.11.25 22:19:00 -
[7]
The overall style of the blog was great, btw. Just the content that was sorely lacking.
GJ on style, CCP!
|

AkJon Ferguson
JC Ferguson and Son Ltd
|
Posted - 2010.11.25 22:25:00 -
[8]
Originally by: Kyle Sucks I'm still worried about what happens to chars who recently remapped to factor in training lots of learning skills :[
That should have been your first remap. You still have one left, right?
Go suck some more.
|

AkJon Ferguson
JC Ferguson and Son Ltd
|
Posted - 2010.11.26 13:14:00 -
[9]
Originally by: Donovans Hello.
I must say I have very mixed feelings about this whole " learning skills getting axed " issue. Of course I resent losing some skill points per hour under ideal circumstances: I trained those skills for an everlasting bonus and now I am the only one having to sacrifice however little of my sp/hour for the benefit of others. Amazing.
What really irritates me is the mockery and irony that I think permeate this blog of yours. You rejoice because I lost my sp/hour advantage over folks who didn't see fit to train those same skills. You cheer because you lower my sp/hour rate on top of that. You give those same folks the chance to ridicule me and my playstyle on the forums. You even have the brazen gall to call that a " present ". And to top it off you inform me that this is only about half of what I'll be getting.
Hey, I'm really amazed for your gifts.

lol +1
Ironically, my only toon who will benefit is my 80M SP toon from the character bazaar, whose previous owner not only didn't max out learning skills, but also chose the brilliant omni-remap. All 4 of my sub-2-year-old toons were happily training at 2772, and happily gaining a few million SP per year on the MANY bozos who apparently didn't see learning as a no-brainer at all. Learning skills are awesome. This decision stinks. CCP is lost. That is all.
|

AkJon Ferguson
JC Ferguson and Son Ltd
|
Posted - 2010.11.26 13:40:00 -
[10]
The 72 SP/hr isn't the issue for me (it's annoying, but meh, what I wanted was an earned competitive advantage, not any particular raw training speed.)
It's CCP giving out 5.37M SP to everyone (which is effectively what they've done.)
I didn't like it when they gave 100K to everyone and I like this 53.7 times less.
There are too many people in this game (many of whom are in this thread) who crave instant gratification. This decision will bring in even more. And CCP will clamor to satisfy them even more. And EVE won't be EVE anymore. As others have postulated, the Battleship V's of the world will be the next to go and then some idiotic CCP employee will declare skill training obsolete.
What a waste.
|
|

AkJon Ferguson
JC Ferguson and Son Ltd
|
Posted - 2010.11.26 17:36:00 -
[11]
Edited by: AkJon Ferguson on 26/11/2010 17:42:10
Originally by: RaTTuS Edited by: RaTTuS on 26/11/2010 13:48:02
Originally by: AkJon Ferguson
It's CCP giving out 5.37M SP to everyone (which is effectively what they've done.)
not it isn't - it's only that if you had done 5/5 in all - including the charisma ones - most character it will be less
Ummm, yeah, it is exactly what they've done and the most accurate way to think about this. CCP is essentially giving 5.37M SP to everyone, forcing them to spend it to the extent possible on learning skills (which are supposed to be a no-brainer train anyway,) and then allowing them to spend the rest as they choose. They're also reducing the max training speed from 2772 SP/hr to 2700 SP/hr.
Giving away SP is as bad as selling SP. It's bad for EVE. It's more pee in the sandbox.
I'm liking the EVE Classic idea more and more. CCP, I've never been on SiSi, why don't you break the game there (give everyone free titans and max skills and unlimited ISK, etc, which seems to be the road you're going down) and make people choose which server to play on and make everybody happy?
Oh, and why does this plan annoy 'bitter vets' (I'm not sure if someone who's played for less than 2 years qualifies but whatever)? Because 5.37M SP (at least of the 'no-brainer' train variety) in the hands of a nooblet are, of course, FAR more valuable than 5.37M SP to someone who already has tens of millions of the things.
|

AkJon Ferguson
JC Ferguson and Son Ltd
|
Posted - 2010.11.26 18:24:00 -
[12]
Originally by: Vega Vix Or maybe you guys have seen the problem and are looking for a solution?
I think they see the problem is loyal, long-term players who brought them the financial success they enjoy today. This is the solution.
|

AkJon Ferguson
JC Ferguson and Son Ltd
|
Posted - 2010.11.26 18:37:00 -
[13]
Originally by: Aeonidis I disagree with this, its a nerf. I am an EVE noob, I have just spent 2.5 months training these skills to 5/5 with an investment of ~32.50 USD now not only have I just had those 2.5 months out of my first six months in EVE wasted learning skills that are going away it really seems to me that I wont be training my other skills that I was training up the Learning Skills to train faster on; any faster but rather slower now. So not only did CCP basically steal a third of my initial 6 month payment but they are slowing stealing from me in the long run as well. This sucks, implementation is horrible. I wont be renewing my subscription come January.
Aeonidis
Sorry man, I'd be in the same boat as you if they'd done this a year and a half ago. You totally got shafted.
You find out pretty quickly that this is the best game in the industry with the worst management/dev team in the industry. Seems incongruous, but I figure they had some real geniuses working for them years ago and those people have moved on.
|

AkJon Ferguson
JC Ferguson and Son Ltd
|
Posted - 2010.11.26 18:47:00 -
[14]
Originally by: Rhaegar Thrax My heart goes out to CCP Greyscale for being the one at the CCP office to draw the shortest straw, so he was the one having to deliver this news to the raging hordes of people doing srs bsnss with internet spaceships.
Anyway, glad to see them gone, had a feeling that learning skills was too much of a fat, disgusting guy standing in the doorway that leads to actual play value in New Eden, who repels most new players.
It's allright to get rid of that doorman, he was not good at his job, there are other more efficient doormen waiting further in the hallway that'll ensure that we get the kind of players we want.
Good job CCP, it was a long overdue.
Don't you have a wardec to go petition or something?
|

AkJon Ferguson
JC Ferguson and Son Ltd
|
Posted - 2010.11.26 19:16:00 -
[15]
Originally by: Trebor Daehdoow
Originally by: Mayhem Mugu now please explain why the CSM thinks that those of us with max learning skills should get a nerf while everyone else gets buffed. (everyone gets the skill point repayment)
I for one don't. If you look at the Learning skills proposal on the wiki, you'll see that one suggestion was a slightly more extreme remap be allowed, which would bring the max training rate up to 2760 (vs 2772), as well as an extra remap, and compensation for the cost of the skillbooks.
When CCP discussed their plans with us, I restated those points of concern. However, CCP did not think that they could expand the proposal and still make their QA deadlines for the Xmas release, and I have no reason to believe they were being disingenuous.
Any change to the game is going to be considered a buff by some and a nerf by others; this is really no different. And as someone who has trained learning skills extensively on both my mains, I do not consider this to be a nerf to me -- it is just not as much of an obvious buff as other people are getting.
Note also that the items in the CSM proposal that would render the nerf to 5/5's miniscule (-12 sp/hr) can be added by CCP at a later date. I believe they should do so, I told them so, and I will continue to tell them so.
Dude, 2 problems.
If everyone else got a bigger buff than you, you got nerfed. If CCP boosts Drake damage 20% and boosts the damage of every other ship 50%, they just nerfed the Drake.
2nd, stop harping about the 72 SP/hr. It's a meaningless distraction. If anything, vets should want a LOWER cap, as it makes the SP they've already accumulated more valuable (imagine if the cap were 200 SP/hr, for instance.)
Enjoyed your interview on Lost in EVE. A little wishy-washy, but you had some great moments (especially your 'EVE is a unique game' speech.)
|

AkJon Ferguson
JC Ferguson and Son Ltd
|
Posted - 2010.11.26 20:46:00 -
[16]
Originally by: Shiddy Smell Edited by: Shiddy Smell on 26/11/2010 20:42:38 For everyone crying about their lost 72SP/hour, simply apply 72 of your reimbursed SP to your current skill plan every hour, or 1,728 every day, this way the stated grace period of 8.5 years will stand. This also applies to the people saying "what if you apply the SP to your current plan, then your circumstances change, altering your plan?". Adding them all to skills in one fell swoop makes YOU one of the "instant gratification" crowd. Alternatively, stop playing EvE like it's a job.
EDIT: Fat fingers.
+1
This decision stinks, but not for the reason the 72 SP/hr crowd is mewling about it.
|

AkJon Ferguson
JC Ferguson and Son Ltd
|
Posted - 2010.11.26 20:50:00 -
[17]
Originally by: Dmoney3788
Originally by: Pyro Ninja Vote HERE to see how eve feels about the new change 
lol 93 Yes 11 no so far
As a sometimes-entertaining griefing blogger once wisely said: 'Always bet on stupid.'
I don't doubt that if CCP just announced that 'Everyone's getting 10M SP for free!' it would be wildly popular too.
|

AkJon Ferguson
JC Ferguson and Son Ltd
|
Posted - 2010.11.26 20:57:00 -
[18]
Originally by: Elizabeth Mellon Why don't eve players stand up for themselves? CCP isnt going to give you free ISK for being a brown-nosed idiot.
Hey now, it works for Chribba.
|

AkJon Ferguson
JC Ferguson and Son Ltd
|
Posted - 2010.11.27 18:26:00 -
[19]
The 'get rid of tier 2 learning only' idea has already been presented. It is indeed vastly superior to the current proposal but the next time CCP adopts somebody else's good idea instead of stumbling backward with their own harebrained idea will be the first.
The optimal solution would split the 'gift' up into 2 parts (all announced now.)
This Christmas we all get tier 1 learning skills bumped to IV (and reimbursed to the extent we had them.)
Next Christmas we all get tier 2 learning skills bumped to IV (and reimbursed to the extent we had them.)
That way instead of giving away 5.37M SP to every toon in one fell swoop (which is a horribly unbalanced idea) they'd be giving away ~272K SP now and ~679K SP next Christmas. Those numbers are much more reasonable (more like EVE, less like WoW.)
Or, if CCP has ADD to the extent that its hoped-for new playerbase does, it could give both of these 'gifts' at once.
But giving away 5.37M SP to EVERY toon is a horrible precedent. It breaks the game far more than reimbursing the $ for learning skillbooks ever would.
|

AkJon Ferguson
JC Ferguson and Son Ltd
|
Posted - 2010.11.27 18:55:00 -
[20]
Why my solution is best:
It preserves the one decision that isn't a no-brainer (train to V or not.) It maintains a small competitive advantage for those who have sacrificed to achieve one. It doesn't involve giving away an outlandish amount of SP relative to any previous giveaway (or starting stats.) It would be true to EVE, and to CCP's 'HTFU' slogan (so far, the only people CCP has told to HTFU are those who are incensed that they're caving to the whiners, WoWers and EZ moders with this HAVE SOME FREE STUFFZ! decision.)
(BTW when I say bump to IV, obviously if you're already at V you'd stay there.)
|
|

AkJon Ferguson
JC Ferguson and Son Ltd
|
Posted - 2010.11.27 19:00:00 -
[21]
Originally by: GUBZZ What the HELL are you talking about? I'm not getting 5.37M SP
Do me a favor, if you're going to be wrong, do it a little more quietly. Thanks.
Everybody is getting 5.37M free SP. Here is a summary of the devblog:
"Hi, I'm in Iceland, that's really cool! You all get 5.37M SP for Xmas! You must spend them on learning to the extent possible! You can spend the rest however you want! We're capping training speed at 2700SP/hr! Christians suck! HTFU!"
|

AkJon Ferguson
JC Ferguson and Son Ltd
|
Posted - 2010.11.27 19:18:00 -
[22]
Originally by: Malcanis
Listen, you're raging so hard about whatever it is that you're not even coherent any more.
'anis, please don't confuse your inability to comprehend with my inability to communicate.
Have Tippia 'splain it to you.
And raging? Uh, no. I thought the swipe at Christians was hilarious, if totally unprofessional and ill-advised.
|

AkJon Ferguson
JC Ferguson and Son Ltd
|
Posted - 2010.11.27 19:40:00 -
[23]
Originally by: devonii 1. Since CCP is determined to whipe away ability for people to differentiate themselves through learning (their perogative), then:
AkJon's rule: Never take advice from someone who uses the 'words' 'whipe' and 'perogative' in the same sentence.
|

AkJon Ferguson
JC Ferguson and Son Ltd
|
Posted - 2010.11.27 19:49:00 -
[24]
Anyway, if people reading this thread take away nothing else, please get it through your heads that the effective outcome (regardless of how they've structured it to try to hide its actual substance) of this 'gift' is a 5.37M SP giveaway to EVERYONE. They are forcing you to spend those SP on learning to the extent possible, but since learning skills are a 'no-brainer' that restriction isn't particularly onerous.
If you like the idea of massive SP bonanzas for all, you should applaud CCP's action. If you don't, you should be opposed, it's really that simple.
Perhaps next Xmas, it will be Navigation skills. That's 9.7M SP worth, surely they'll want to top this year's 'gift', no?
|

AkJon Ferguson
JC Ferguson and Son Ltd
|
Posted - 2010.11.27 20:20:00 -
[25]
Oops, got my devblogs mixed up. The anti-Christian swipe was in the microtransactions one, not this one. Mea culpa.
|

AkJon Ferguson
JC Ferguson and Son Ltd
|
Posted - 2010.11.27 21:47:00 -
[26]
Originally by: KrustyKrab
Good job CCP, +1 from entire WoW Cartel Alliance.
Fixed it for you.
Yes, massive (5.37M) handouts of free SP rate to be popular. So what?
I'll be able to fly a Thanny, a Legion, a Zealot, a Guardian, a Golem, a Machariel and a Broadsword instantly because of this 'gift'. These are all really cool ships that I've been looking forward to flying for a long time. But I chose EVE because I don't like instant gratification, I like that you have to drool over a certain ship for months or years before you can fly it. 5.37M SP as a freebie is nuts.
|

AkJon Ferguson
JC Ferguson and Son Ltd
|
Posted - 2010.11.27 22:02:00 -
[27]
tl;dr
EVE: Steep learning curve, long time commitment, dark, unforgiving, sandboxy etc.
Every other MMO: Hello Kitty in grindsville at cash shop in DisneyWorld
Troll asshats and CCP: Let's make EVE like every other MMO!
Me: Let's not and say we did
Troll asshats: Your stuff, can I haz?
|

AkJon Ferguson
JC Ferguson and Son Ltd
|
Posted - 2010.11.28 11:27:00 -
[28]
Originally by: Zemfadel you got rid of all NPC skill book orders to help curb scamming??? those who usually buy skill books probably havent seen this thread and will end up spending 4.5M ISK on a book thats about to be deleted, not to mention players joining right now are severly crippled in training ability for the next couple of weeks without the tier 1 skill books.
can you please put them back on market to help actually "[limit] the amount of scams..."
restocking the market will stop people from selling them at ridiculous prices and then The Plan can be implemented giving them the appropriate amount of isk for the books and still allowing new players/alts to train effectively for the next couple weeks if they feel its worth the extra cost and limiting their losses if they aren't aware of The Plan.
if not can you at least help me understand your reasoning because i must be missing something?
What you're missing is that CCP employees are not very bright. I'm not sure how you missed it. I'll point out the short bus they all ride to work on the next time it passes by.
|
|
|
|